Costi: 0.
Icone Abilità:

Veloce. Solo quando stai per avere successo in una prova di abilità.

Ricevi +2 al tuo valore di abilità in questa prova.

"McGlen, stai cercando di farci ammazzare tutti e due?"
"Non stavolta, amico. Non stavolta."
Darek Zabrocki
La Strada per Carcosa #30.
Manovra Spericolata

Daring Maneuver’s stock is going up as the succeed by X archetype is getting more defined. Momentum in particular works really well with Daring Maneuver, allowing you to turn any success into at least a -2 difficulty on the next test, which in turn can further enable more oversuccess. Tony Morgan with fight tests, "Skids" O'Toole, Wendy Adams and Finn Edwards with Lockpicks or Slip Away, Sefina Rousseau with Suggestion, or Jenny Barnes or even Preston Fairmont with Well Connected. Although the interaction with Lucky Cigarette Case is clear, this also works well with Crystallizer of Dreams as a way to be up 1 on a later test. I’m starting to run this card in most of my Rogue decks to good success.

StyxTBeuford · 8106
73 likes? What the heck? — Tsuruki23 · 1267
Yeah I have no idea either. Someone 69d it and now it’s gotten 4 more likes. — StyxTBeuford · 8106
It was me. I thought it must be a visual error only I can see. If you also see the problem, someone should probably tell the site admins, as all I did was press the like button 70+ times. — Lucaxiom · 2028
Yep, I still have the ability to keep raising it. Who do be talk to about that? — Lucaxiom · 2028
It’s not an error, you’re allowed to like something as much as you want to. — StyxTBeuford · 8106
You're kidding? Isn't that just begging for heavy exploitation and point manipulation? — Lucaxiom · 2028
"The points don't matter" — StyxTBeuford · 8106
Glad to see the point system hasn't changed. — Lucaxiom · 2028
This review has 350 likes now lol — Soloclue · 1743
According to the likes, this review definitely succeeded by at least 2, so you probably don't need to play Daring Maneuver on it. Hope you DoN'd it — Zinjanthropus · 96
Should I review Daring Maneuver 2? Lol — StyxTBeuford · 8106
Um, guys? Why 1000? — StyxTBeuford · 8106
Shhhhh.... just let it happen. — Lucaxiom · 2028
Oh- okay. Big number — StyxTBeuford · 8106
Omg look at the likes — jonklin · 1

Seems odd at first glance, why would you need +2 if you have passed? My initial reaction was that it would help land Double or Nothing but it doesn't actually help there, because of how that works (it doubles the difficulty rather than you needing to get double the target).

It does combo with cards where you need to succeed by a certain amount:


.41 Derringer

Opportunist (though this seems a pretty poor use)


Rex Murphy's trigger

Expose Weakness


Alchemical Transmutation

(I might well have missed a couple)

Ultimately none of these uses are that mind blowing. I think a card that only works in combination, and only provides lukewarm benefits even if you draw the combo together is pretty weak.

I'd like to add that it also pairs with quick thinking. — FractalMind · 22
Cool, thanks. I also missed the advanced version of Fearless — waferthinninja · 21
what about the trusty shotgun? — stetson · 3
And Viscious Blow 2? — AndyB · 442
And lockpicks. — XehutL · 45